AddThis Feed Button

Recent Posts

  • Sprinting to Enlightenment
  • Once more, with barely any feeling
  • You’re not intuitive, you’re lazy
  • Now this really bugs me
  • Homicidal Homeopaths!
  • 98-pound positive thinking weaklings
  • Oh, and let’s be prepared for 12/22/2012
  • Add this to my 11 year history of alien abduction
  • You heard it here first
  • The Confidence Con Game
  • I couldn’t care less. Really. I tried.
  • Sitting in a room all alone
  • Spiritual Schmiritual
  • Do what you love and the money WON’T follow
  • Mantra power from Sweden
  • Start watching TV, Maitreya is coming, Maitreya is coming!
  • I’m not leaving, but I am moving… ish
  • Oh, those wacky Buddhists…
  • How to be successful in anything… finally, the truth revealed!
  • I think I can’t. I think I can’t. Oh… oops, I was wrong.
  • Who you are really… AS IF!
  • Buddha the Internet Marketer
  • Attractive ways to attract attraction-attracting attractiveness
  • Die your potential
  • Shoot me. Shoot me now! Why? It’s beyond a secret.
  • Water is not water (and other things Quantum Physics DOES NOT say)
  • What science says about enlightenment
  • You can be Tony Robbins!
  • Semper Ube Sub Ube
  • The Three Stooges of Truth…
  • Fundamentalist Physicists and Religious Atheists
  • Well, I’ll be reintarnated!
  • Mike Myers (as The Love Guru) is the root of all evil
  • Does my cat have free will… or is that a hairball?
  • Questioning Questions
  • Brain Waves Goodbye
  • You don’t deserve your rights
  • Physics Schmysics!
  • Why, yes, I AM rubber!
  • You can have ANYTHING you want… NOT!
  • I’m all blocked up…
  • Wrong about being right
  • Develop a New Habit? Give me 21 days, and I’ll give you… three weeks
  • What me spiritual?
  • You’re special… SO special
  • In fact, I DON’T want to ATTRACT anything to me
  • Okay, Oprah, let’s settle this once and for all…
  • Hoping to be a successhole
  • Manifrustration
  • If you think you can, or you think you can’t… who cares what you think!
  • Archives

  • March 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • May 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • Categories

  • argument (8)
  • atheism (1)
  • atheists (1)
  • binaural beat (1)
  • brain wave (1)
  • Buddhism (3)
  • cognitive psychology (11)
  • creationism (2)
  • debate (3)
  • deepak chopra (1)
  • Evolutionary Psychology (12)
  • goal setting (6)
  • Gurus (19)
  • homeopathy (2)
  • intelligent design (2)
  • manifestation (13)
  • Marianne Willamson (1)
  • Meditation (15)
  • mike myers (1)
  • Nelson Mandela (1)
  • New Age (12)
  • New Age thinking (22)
  • new word (1)
  • oprah (2)
  • past lives (1)
  • positive thinking (2)
  • Prescriptions for living (3)
  • Psychology (19)
  • quantum physics (4)
  • reincarnation (1)
  • self-help (7)
  • Self-Improvement (33)
  • sloppy thinking (20)
  • Spiritual Growth (28)
  • spirituality (4)
  • stupid science (3)
  • the love guru (1)
  • the secret (6)
  • Uncategorized (2)

  •  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Wrong about being right

    Every now and then the “check oil” light on your car’s dashboard turns red… so you add a quart of 10w-40 and go on your merry way… or your grumpy way… or whatever way you were going.

    Some time later, the light lights, you toss in another quart (unless you’re driving in Europe, where you would add a liter, which, thanks to Schoolhouse Rock, I know is a little more than a quart).

    Then, one day, you go to the shop for them to, oh, whatever mechanics do at the shop — calibrate the servo-trans-turbo-anti-locking-carburator thingy or something (it doesn’t matter WHY you’re at the shop; that’s not the important part of the story) — and the mechanic says, “Hey, I just noticed that this oil light of yours is broken. It’ll just go off at any old time for no reason.”

    What would that knowledge to do you?
    Your car was broken, but you had no external indication of the problem. Would it even occur to you that the oil light was faulty? Of course not.

    This, by the way is a more tame version of the thought-experiment … the more National Enquirer version is: What if you just found out that your “mother” is really your grandmother and your “sister” is actually your bio-mom? (And let’s add that as you scan your history, there is NO INDICATION at all that this was the case.)

    Does this change your thoughts about who you are?

    Regardless of your answer, consider this:

    What if your most fundamental decision-making mechanism was broken and you didn’t know it?

    Not that you were unable to make decisions, nor that every decision you made led to some unpleasant circumstance. But what if, say, it had a short-circuit so that any time you were deliberating or trying to decide between some options the “YES” signal went off totally randomly, having nothing to do with any sort of rational thinking process, and you just went with that YES, because you had no reason to think it wasn’t the result of a faulty YES-meter?

    And what if, I’ll say this again to highlight it, you had no objective indication that this was happening? Sometimes the YES worked out well; other times not so well.
    Would you be able to tell that your YES-meter was broken?

    Nope.

    And this problem is bigger than your car issue, because if you wanted to examine your decision-making mechanism, guess what? The only tool you have is the broken decision-making mechanism. So, if you start looking at the “data,” and played with theories about whether it was working or not, you could get a big random YES that “confirms” a theory that’s completely not true.

    That is, you can’t use your damaged analysis tool to determine if you have a damaged analysis tool.

    What difference, if any, would you expect to experience in your life if it turned out that, all along, ever since you were born, your decision-making analysis tool were broken and you just found out?

    You can probably guess why I’m suggesting this line of thinking.

    It could be true (though, again, if it is, it would be almost impossible to determine!)

    Wrap your brain around that for a bit and let me know what you find… or take a gander at On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You’re Not  by Robert Burton, and let’s chat 😉

    5 Responses to “Wrong about being right”

    1. Ann Says:

      Well, then I would have to ask – Do our decisions matter? Even – based on “Blink” – Do we even *make* our decisions?

      A “no” on either or both of those, could possibly take a big load of stress off… or cause one… depending on how we think about these facts, if true.

      Sheesh… my head is spinning… now what do we do?

      Love, Ann

    2. sashen Says:

      “Matter?”

      In what sense?

      Clearly, some “decisions” (whether we “make them” or whether they happen to us) seem to lead to things we like and others seem to lead to things we don’t like. And then we die. 😉

      “Blink,” in many ways is all about the Feeling of Knowing and how, SOMETIMES, it’s correct even when we can’t identify how/why. Of course the problem with Blink is that:

      a) Many people took away from Blink the idea that you could/should trust your gut-feeling first impressions. But as Gladwell barely pointed out, this is only a useful strategy if you’re an expert in the field in question. That said…

      b) For each of the “experts” whose feeling-of-knowing was correct, there were MANY more for whom the SAME feeling of knowing was incorrect. The validity of the feeling-of-knowing was only determined after the fact…but the FEELING itself was no different up until that time. And no doubt, in other circumstances, the tables were turned and today’s expert is tomorrow’s “oops, I was wrong.”

    3. Ann Says:

      Okay, “matter” was imprecise and I should know better here.

      I wish I could think of a more useful way to say it, but they all land in some predictable variations, including, but not limited to: “I’d be happier if . . . (I made or didn’t make a particular decision,” or “I’d feel justified/right if . . . (a particular decision resulted in what I predicted.) and things like that, all of which are not only unlikely, but also untrue, and while I’m at it, sressful.

      I think I’ll just go read a book and go to sleep. I just thought I’d try to use this information to find some more relaxed ways to live – which makes it a goal – which has been pointed out as the best way to guarantee failure.

      Many philosophies say that there is a period of “undoing” on the way to what they call “enlightenment” where we let go of ways we used to think. I’ve done some of that and I’m still floundering in imprecision and stress more often that I care to be.

      Pleasant dreams! Ann

    4. sashen Says:

      Uggh, don’t get me started on the “many philosophies” and their sales pitches for “enlightenment.”

      FWIW, one of the big arguments between the 2 Zen schools is “is enlightenment gradual or sudden”? Needless to say, there hasn’t been an answer in, oh, 1000 years or so… suggesting that the problem is NOT determining the correct answer, but some glitch in the premise of the question.

      Want to have a more relaxed way to live?

      Start by noticing when you’re arguing with the reality of your life — which now, according to you, includes floundering in imprecision and stress more often than” you would like. Then, you may want to consider the 1st teaching of the Buddha which, if I may paraphrase, and I will, is:

      Hey, Life Sucks… Now Get Over Yourself!

    5. Ann O'Johnson Says:

      Ah so!

      Now I get it!

      Love, Ann

      “Oh no! Not again!”

      – a bowl of petunias, according to Douglas Adams




     

     

     

     

    Religion Blogs - Blog Top Sites