{"id":44,"date":"2007-11-21T13:04:24","date_gmt":"2007-11-21T19:04:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/44\/we-are-in-the-matrix\/"},"modified":"2007-11-21T13:04:24","modified_gmt":"2007-11-21T19:04:24","slug":"we-are-in-the-matrix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/44\/we-are-in-the-matrix\/","title":{"rendered":"We *are* in the Matrix"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What follows is a book review for a book I haven&#8217;t read yet (I just ordered it).  I&#8217;m reprinting this here not only to point to what seems like a great read, but because the review itself highlights some of my all-time favorite cognitive biases and thinking errors. While neither the book nor the review highlight how these thinking glitches affect people in the spiritual and psychological growth game (those playing the game and those who think they&#8217;re running the game or making up the rules), I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll be able to make the connections yourself.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, as you read about these biases, notice if you think, &#8220;I don&#8217;t do that one.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If you have that thought, let me suggest the following: &#8220;Yes, actually, you do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And if you get offended by *that*, remember, I don&#8217;t know who you are! It&#8217;s not personal \ud83d\ude09  Oh, and also remember: Self-righteous indignation is usually (like, always) a sign of guilt \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n<p>I know you do these things because we ALL do these things. You, me, and all the other 112 billion people who&#8217;ve ever been on the planet. And one of my favorite cognitive biases is the thought that while every other human being who has ever lived does it&#8230; *I* don&#8217;t because *I* am special.<\/p>\n<p>So, with that, may I present:<\/p>\n<h4 align=\"center\">The Matrix of the Brain<\/h4>\n<p class=\"Author\" align=\"center\">a book review by David Ludden<br \/>\noriginally published in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.skeptic.com\/subscribe\" title=\"Skeptic Magazine and Newsletter\" target=\"_blank\">eSkeptic Newsletter<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ProseFirstLines\"><span class=\"FirstLines\">In the 1999 science-fantasy  film<\/span> <em>The Matrix<\/em>, people have been plugged into a giant computer  that creates a virtual reality that is both pleasing and plausible. A few  renegade humans have unplugged themselves from the Matrix, only to wake up to a  miserable underground existence below a war-scorched Earth. In a similar  fashion, our brains generate a comforting version of reality that protects us  from the desolation and despair of the real world.<\/p>\n<p>We implicitly trust the products of our brains \u00e2\u20ac\u201d our perceptions, our  memories, our judgments, our sense of self. We say, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I know what I saw,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and we  ask, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153How could I forget?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d After all, if you cannot trust your own brain, who  can you trust? But all is not as it seems. More than half a century of cognitive  and social psychology research has shown that much of what we see, remember, and  think is an illusion. In her new book <em>A Mind of its Own<\/em>, Cordelia Fine  lays out in a highly entertaining fashion the myriad ways in which our vain,  immoral, pig-headed brains are constantly deceiving us.<\/p>\n<p>Although we like to think of ourselves as rational beings, our brains  covertly strive to create for us a view of the world and of ourselves that is  self serving but not necessarily consistent with reality. Beliefs and opinions  are formed quickly and become part of how we define ourselves, so the brain  selectively perceives and recalls evidence that supports cherished beliefs while  disregarding or forgetting evidence that contradicts our beliefs. Fine calls  this \u00e2\u20ac\u0153motivated skepticism.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d We are naturally skeptical of anything that  challenges our beliefs, but accepting of anything that bolsters our beliefs, and  hence our egos. For example, it is for us easy to mock the tenets of other  religions \u00e2\u20ac\u201d \u00e2\u20ac\u0153How could they possibly believe <em>that<\/em>?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201d while swallowing  whole the equally far-fetched teachings of our own church.<\/p>\n<p class=\"imagefloatleft\" style=\"margin: 10px 5px 10px 25px; float: right\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0393062139?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=skepticcom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0393062139\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Motivated skepticism can even lead to belief polarization, a process whereby  counterevidence only strengthens the convictions of our beliefs. The  counterevidence is strenuously scrutinized for any weakness, which is then used  to diminish the validity of evidence for our opponent\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s point of view. Our  selective perceptions are further bolstered by illusory correlations. These are  caused largely by selective memory, in which we remember only supporting  examples but not counterexamples. For instance, if you already believe the  stereotype that all Asians are shy, you will only recall experiences that  support this stereotype. When confronted with an assertive Asian, the reaction  is likely to be: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Yes, but she grew up in America.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d In such a fashion,  counterexamples are simply dismissed as aberrations.<\/p>\n<p>Our brains also trick us into believing we have more control over situations  than we really do. We blow on dice and perform other rituals to influence  events. We also feel safer driving than flying because we think we are in  control behind the steering wheel. This is especially true when things turn out  in our favor. For instance, we take the credit for picking a winning lottery  ticket, but blame a losing ticket on bad luck. It would seem that going through  life deluded by our own brains would not be a good thing, but that is not  necessarily the case. Some people have markedly more balanced self-perceptions  than normal people \u00e2\u20ac\u201d they know clearly what their limitations are and how little  control they actually have over their lives. They are also clinically depressed,  and seeing reality for what it is, they become overwhelmed and lose the desire  to go on living. So it seems that our brains delude us to keep us happy, healthy  and ready to face life\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s challenges. In fact, people who are generally  optimistic tend to live longer.<\/p>\n<p>Emotional arousal also plays an important role in cognitive functions. Brain  damage can create a mismatch between emotion and rational thought. People who  cannot experience arousal during the decision making process, for example,  become incapable of making decisions or consistently make poor choices. It seems  that the gut feeling we get when faced with a choice is more important than any  rational decision-making process.<\/p>\n<p>The experience of emotion is also integral to our sense of self. In a  condition known as Capgras syndrome, patients no longer feel any sort of arousal  in the presence of family members, and so they become convinced that their loved  ones have been replaced by impostors. Others lose the ability to feel emotion  altogether; they also feel detached from themselves and lose all interest in  life. Even healthy individuals experience this depersonalization sometimes,  particularly during traumatic experiences. Afterward, people report a feeling of  detachment from the events around them and even from themselves. This seems to  be a coping mechanism of the brain to keep it from becoming overwhelmed.<\/p>\n<p>By three quarters of the way through the book, the reader is yearning for a  return to blissful ignorance, as there seems to be no escape from what Fine  calls \u00e2\u20ac\u0153our innate lack of scientific rigor.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d But still there is hope. Fine  advises that we \u00e2\u20ac\u0153[t]reat with the greatest suspicion the proof of [our] own  eyes.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d In other words, we need to trust in the scientific method to lead us out  of the tangle of deceptions our brains weave around us. As with any other  behavior, modes of thinking can be practiced until they become automatic, and so  Fine is hopeful that practice in critical thinking can help guard us from the  extravagances of our own brains.<\/p>\n<p>One of the strongest points of this book is the way Fine deftly describes how  research is done in psychology. She does not just tell what is known about how  the brain deceives, she explains how we know it. In friendly terms, she presents  hypotheses to test, clearly describes how experiments are set up, and shows us  how reasonable conclusions are draw from the data. Thus, she demonstrates how  the scientific method can be used to overcome our false beliefs and  misconceptions.<\/p>\n<p>Life is pleasant inside the virtual reality of our minds. So what if we think  we are more intelligent or virtuous than others and believe we are more in  control than we really are? Such minor self-deceptions are, for the most part,  harmless, and they may help us to get through the day. But we are not  necessarily prisoners of our minds. When the deceptions become harmful to  ourselves and others, there is a way out. Science gives us a way to unplug  ourselves from the Matrix of our brains.<\/p>\n<p>Click here to order <em>&gt; <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0393062139?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=quantumwealth-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0393062139\">A Mind of its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=quantumwealth-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0393062139\" style=\"border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important\" border=\"0\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What follows is a book review for a book I haven&#8217;t read yet (I just ordered it). I&#8217;m reprinting this here not only to point to what seems like a great read, but because the review itself highlights some of my all-time favorite cognitive biases and thinking errors. While neither the book nor the review [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[12,6,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cognitive-psychology","category-evolutionary-psychology","category-psychology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sashen.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}