<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Stooges of Truth&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sashen.com/blog/83/the-three-stooges-of-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sashen.com/blog/83/the-three-stooges-of-truth/</link>
	<description>Investigations on the Psycho-Spiritual Life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt from new zealand</title>
		<link>http://sashen.com/blog/83/the-three-stooges-of-truth/#comment-31784</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from new zealand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashen.com/blog/?p=83#comment-31784</guid>
		<description>I think maybe the word sceptic might better replace the word cynic as there are plenty of people that would love to belief something if for the fact that they had imperical evidence (can you see whats wrong with that statement?). It's still funny that a person like myself can still use the word believe and fact in the same sentance and this as you can see is one of our greatest banes....we don't need facts to believe....we need facts to know! The new age movement fails to understand this.  Yes you can be a cynic depite having large amounts validating information to prove oneself wrong.Cynical can equal a closed mind,sceptical can equal an enquiring mind. As Francis Bacon once said "it's not wether you agree or disagree, it's wether you way and consider". Personally if I was offered up a choice between a closed mind, an open mind or an enquiring mind. The enquiring mind wins hands down. Being proven wrong can be beautiful thing just as much as being proven right. The truth aint always pretty...... it just is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think maybe the word sceptic might better replace the word cynic as there are plenty of people that would love to belief something if for the fact that they had imperical evidence (can you see whats wrong with that statement?). It&#8217;s still funny that a person like myself can still use the word believe and fact in the same sentance and this as you can see is one of our greatest banes&#8230;.we don&#8217;t need facts to believe&#8230;.we need facts to know! The new age movement fails to understand this.  Yes you can be a cynic depite having large amounts validating information to prove oneself wrong.Cynical can equal a closed mind,sceptical can equal an enquiring mind. As Francis Bacon once said &#8220;it&#8217;s not wether you agree or disagree, it&#8217;s wether you way and consider&#8221;. Personally if I was offered up a choice between a closed mind, an open mind or an enquiring mind. The enquiring mind wins hands down. Being proven wrong can be beautiful thing just as much as being proven right. The truth aint always pretty&#8230;&#8230; it just is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sashen</title>
		<link>http://sashen.com/blog/83/the-three-stooges-of-truth/#comment-29072</link>
		<dc:creator>sashen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashen.com/blog/?p=83#comment-29072</guid>
		<description>You know, Ron, I made that point to one of the producers. I asked "So, why are you attracting all this dissent instead of automatic acceptance."

Can you say, "Dodge the question" ?

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Ron, I made that point to one of the producers. I asked &#8220;So, why are you attracting all this dissent instead of automatic acceptance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you say, &#8220;Dodge the question&#8221; ?</p>
<p> <img src='http://sashen.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Grubaugh</title>
		<link>http://sashen.com/blog/83/the-three-stooges-of-truth/#comment-29066</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Grubaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashen.com/blog/?p=83#comment-29066</guid>
		<description>But you're overlooking something Steve. In the case of the "secret" proponents, all they need do is visualize universal acceptance and there it is. Why would they bother with cynicism, ridicule and non-belief?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you&#8217;re overlooking something Steve. In the case of the &#8220;secret&#8221; proponents, all they need do is visualize universal acceptance and there it is. Why would they bother with cynicism, ridicule and non-belief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
